Showing posts with label Asrar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Asrar. Show all posts

Friday, 30 April 2010

Tender Proposal


Design

Early-on we decided to go with a crane with a rotating boom as we thought this would be the most efficient and practical way of transporting the load.
However to achieve this the length of the boom would need to be at-least 2m to transfer the load 4m from the point of lift. We realised that a 2m beam would be too heavy and large to transport.
To overcome this problem we split the beam into two half's of 1.1m and 1.2m respectively. These two beams would be joined together using this part:-


Each beams will be connected to the I-beam connector by 5 M16 hex bolts, hence insuring structural stability while solving the problem of making the crane portable.

Another feature of the design is hinged leg joints:-

This part of the design allows the crane to be stable while on uneven terrain by adjusting the height of the feet.
This part will be connected to the feet which will clamp to the floor to give the crane a more rigid feel. The feet will be interchangeable so according to the terrain the correct feet can be used.


Here is what the finished crane looks like:-



Detailed Drawings of Each Part

1.1m Beam

1.2m Beam

Center Console

Feet-Leg Connector

I-Beam Connection

Large Leg

Large Leg Connector

Small Leg

Small Leg Connector
Assembly Drawing with Bill of Materials
(not sure why the pictures are not click-able e-mail me at razaqa@aston.ac.uk if you require better pictures)
(Asrar)

Manufacture and Fitness for Purpose

After extensive researching and brainstorming with the group meeting we decided to use an I-Beam instead of a solid Block or T-Beam.
Reasons
  1. An I-Beam is generally used for construction and heavy weight lifting purposes this is because it is more stable and deflects less than the T-beam and has a significant amount of weight less than a Solid Block.
  2. If the amount of material used to produce a I-Beam is less obviously the amount of material used would be less thus reducing the final cost of the product.
After this decision and extensive research on different materials their densities and Young’s modulus calculations were done to calculate the maximum deflection a beam would be able to withstand and the amount our beam would deflect under the maximum load specified. These values came up to be at about 9.28*10^-3m the maximum deflection and 4.2*10^-3m which was the deflection the I-beam would have under the maximum load. This proved that the choice of material, which was carbon steel and length is appropriate so the beam will not fail under maximum conditions.
Calculations were also done to calculate the maximum compression on the centre part which came up to about 960KN and then we did some calculations to calculate the compression which it will undergo under the maximum load. We added another 4000Kg in the calculation just to be sure. So the end result was that the maximum compressive force that the centre piece made up of aluminium alloy can withstand is 960KN and the compressive force with 5000Kg would be 50KN which is considerably less than the earlier value and this is under much more weight than the required amount. So this proves that the material used in the centre part is appropriate and it will not fail under maximum conditions.
(Zaeem)

Finance


Component Mass Material Quantity Cost
Hand Winch

1 £90.95
Pulley

1 £7.64
Wire Rope

1 £32.90
M8 Bolts

100 £5.61
M8 Nuts

100 £2.21
M8 Washers

100 £0.90
M16 Bolts

50 £17.99
M16 Nuts

100 £12.95
M16 Washers

100 £4.87
Boom 117Kg Carbon steel 1 £52.61
Centre console 98.018Kg Aluminium 1 £148.28
Large leg connector 24.621Kg Aluminium 1 £37.25
Small leg connector 10.327Kg Aluminium 1 £15.62
Feet 5.85Kg Aluminium 3 £26.55
Small leg 2.757Kg Aluminium 3 £12.51
Large leg 3.848Kg Aluminium 3 £17.46
I-Beam connection 2.104Kg Carbon steel 1 £0.95

The total cost of our crane = £487.25 (excluding manufacturing and labour costs)
(Daljinder)

Conclusion

We have not as yet received accurate costs from manufactures of the cost of labour and manufacture but many companies have quoted us a price in the region of £300.

This will bring the total cost of the crane to £787.25; we will be looking for a unit retail price of £1000 with a 10% discount for buys over 100 cranes.

We think this is a very competitive price and you can be rest assured the quality of our product will be second to none, we are very proud of the reputation our company has achieved over the years and will not let you down.

We look forward to your reply

(Hani)

Thursday, 29 April 2010

Design Drawings

Final Rendered Image

Drawings and rendered images of each part
1.1m Beam

1.2m Beam

I-Beam Connector


Center Console

Large Leg


Small Leg

Large Leg Connector

Small Leg Connector
Hinge

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Beam Analysis




(post has been back dated so it in chronological order)

Thursday, 1 April 2010

Sunday, 21 March 2010

Initial Design


After sitting together and brainstorming on the different types of cranes. We concluded with the following design. The type 3 crane.

Our reasoning was that it would be more practical given the situation. It can be broken into smaller parts to fit into a 4 by 4. It can be made so that the feet provide stability even on an uneven ground. If designed properly it would carry over 1000 kg.

After drawing a simple sketch of the design the green light was given. We decided to split into two groups to fasten the process. Group one will design the top half and group two will design the bottom half. there will be an overlapping section between the two groups when connected the two parts together.

From here on each group will further its research and designs.

Brainstorming




Thursday, 4 March 2010

Testing

These are the respected roles assigned to group members


Hani Saleh
Project Manager
Daljinder sandhu
Finance Officer
Hani/Asrar/Zaeem/Dal
Chief Designer
Asrar Razaq
Stress Analyst
Zaeem Rana
Materials Specialist